Fragments of the Prince Paul case dripped into the media here too. The Globe and Mail adds their view:
“Rumours swirled across Britain Friday about what exactly prompted Prince Charles’s entourage to deny in the most categorical terms allegations that remain secret, sealed by a court injunction.”
Alfons notices that most links at Google point to pages that have been removed or blanked out. However, UseNet to the rescue about the question: what was exactly denied?. And the question: what did Diana know (Scroll down in that article)? Back to the Globe:
“The allegation against the Prince has the potential to be explosive because of Charles’s role as heir to the throne and future king of Canada as well as his eventual role as an important religious figure. The sovereign is also Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church of England.”
(Earlier)